It probable helped that claimant’s doctor opined it would be <a href="https://thelomad.com/getmad.today/wp-contentduplicate-3602675.findlaw5.flsitebuilder.com/blog/2017/01/back-to-the-future-the-return-of-wcl-252-b-fact-finding-without-judges-and-legal-reasoning-without-lawyers/">reasonable for the claimant not to return</a> to the workforce given her orthopedic, bladder, and bowel impairments, but the Board didn’t even look at the claimant’s age, let along any other mitigating factor despite containing them in the decision