At the trial level, claimant testified. Upon conclusion of the testimony, we aggressively argued that the claimant had voluntarily retired – as no doctor suggested or advised to retire, and the claimant testified that it was time for her to retire from the hospital. Further, we argued that the claim for reduced earnings while working at the deli was improper. Specifically, there were no doctors providing any work restrictions and therefore the claimant’s reduced earnings were due solely to the claimant’s own decision to work part-time.