In support of its ruling, the Board noted that it agreed with the carrier that the <a href="https://thelomad.com/getmad.today/wp-contentduplicate-3602675.findlaw5.flsitebuilder.com/blog/2021/01/fraud-in-the-family-claimant-doing-other-work-while-receiving-comp-benefits/">claimant “did not work</a> substantially the whole of the year pereceidng his accident” and that the use of the 224 multiple “reasonably represents the claimant’s annual earning capacity in the year immediately before the injury.”