We argued, not only was there proof there was no asbestos in the building when Claimant alleged they were exposed, but there were significant issues with Claimant’s testimony and memory, with proof Claimant made numerous misstatements to their doctors; while the doctors found <a href="https://thelomad.com/getmad.today/wp-contentwww.getmad.today/blog/2021/05/claim-disallowance-with-unanimous-medical-opinion-giving-causal-relationship/">causal relationship</a> based on those statements, medical reports are only as good as the facts they’re based on, and those not in accordance with the true facts should be set aside